CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS EXPOSED
by Nancy Morgan Hart, Headlines With A Voice
In addition to his criminal activities written about previously, John Roberts is directly implicated in the coup d’état against President Donald J Trump and America.
He and he alone is EXCLUSIVELY responsible for appointing ALL FISA COURT (FISC) JUDGES WITHOUT CONFIRMATION from the Senate and WITHOUT NOMINATION by the Executive branch.
In addition, John Roberts has named EVERY member of the current FISC and the COURT of REVIEW, the separate three-judge panel that hears FISC appeals
No wonder the FISC judges are all SILENT regarding the abuse for the Obama administration spying on President Trump; members of his campaign; and MILLIONS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS.
If that’s not bad enough, there’s more … MUCH MORE.
Justice Roberts’ failures to recuse himself:
This is how John Roberts handled the Leader v Facebook case. In Leader Technologies’ Petition for Writ of Certiorari submitted to Roberts, he failed to recuse himself since he:
(a) Roberts had a personal mentor relationship with Facebook’s appeals attorney, Thomas G. Hungar of Gibson Dunn LLP;
(b) Had substantial holdings in Facebook financial interests;
(c) Failed to demand conflict of interest recusals pursuant to the Code of Conduct from the three-judge panel in Leader v. Facebook since each judge held substantial Facebook financial interests. Federal Circuit Judges and Clerk Alan D. Laurie, Evan J. Wallach, Kimberly A. Moore, Randall R. Rader, and Jan Horbaly;
(d) Failed to set aside the Federal Circuit ruling in Leader v. Facebook once it was discovered that Weil Gotshal LLP attorney Edward R. Reines entered an appearance in Leader v. Facebook on behalf of the Federal Circuit Bar Association (in which the judges were members) while he was simultaneously conspiring with Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall R. Rader to fix cases (Rader was removed from the bench. Chief Justice Roberts had done nothing to police the multiple breaches of ethics of the Leader v. Facebook panel);
(e) Roberts had previously recused himself in a case involving Microsoft, who was and is a notoriously-known principle stockholder and technology provider to Facebook. Therefore his Microsoft holdings gave him a recusable conflict of interest in Leader v. Facebook;
(f) Roberts failed to disclose his common membership and association with Hungar’s partner Theodore B. Olson in the Senior Executive Service (SES) Association shadow government;
(g) Failed to disclose his conflict-level camaraderie with Gibson Dunn LLP’s Theodore B. Olson in the former U.S. Solicitor General’s club. Roberts (1992 Plum Book), Olson (1984 Plum Book);
(h) Failed to order release of Mark Zuckerberg’s 28 computer devices from his Harvard period (2003-2004) after it was discovered in another case that Facebook lied about their existence, claiming they were “lost” … then magically found to be in the possession of Facebook’s appeals attorney Gibson Dunn LLP the entire time.
Edited: Benjamin Edes
HWAV Video: Chief Justice John Roberts EXPOSED
AIM Video: IMPEACH John Roberts SCOTUS TRAITOR